Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:41:52 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Livepatch consistency model update
Message-ID: <20160321224152.pxu5qy57wgyqdcco@treble.redhat.com>
References: <20160321222608.5rkp2chltpjdfpod@treble.redhat.com>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603212329190.3656@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603212329190.3656@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1009
Lines: 25

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:32:34PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> > The objtool stack validation patches have been merged into Linus's tree
> > for 4.6 with commit 26660a4046b1, and all known warnings are fixed.  
> 
> Yup, I've noticed earlier today, this is just excellent! (except for the 
> name, but well, what can we do :-) ). Thanks a lot for all the efforts 
> you've invested into this.

Thanks :-)  I was so relieved to see it finally merged!

> > So I'll be posting a revamped RFC of the hybrid consistency model 
> > patches soon.  The code isn't quite ready, and I'll be on vacation next 
> > week, so it'll probably be either later this week, or the week after 
> > next.
> 
> No matter how immature the code might be, it'd be great if you could 
> repost it still before leaving for your vacation, so that we could start 
> working on it on our side as well without unnecessary delays.

Sure, I'll dump what I have by the end of the week.

-- 
Josh