Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756202AbcCUXAI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:00:08 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56815 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751941AbcCUXAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:00:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:00:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Richard Weinberger Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Boris Brezillon , Maxime Ripard , David Gstir , Dave Chinner , Artem Bityutskiy , Alexander Kaplan , Sasha Levin , Joonsoo Kim , rvaswani@codeaurora.org, "Luck, Tony" , Shailendra Verma , s.strogin@partner.samsung.com Subject: Re: Page migration issue with UBIFS Message-Id: <20160321160001.7598804306da8af40d82edc1@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <56E9C658.1020903@nod.at> References: <56E8192B.5030008@nod.at> <20160315151727.GA16462@node.shutemov.name> <56E82B18.9040807@nod.at> <20160315153744.GB28522@infradead.org> <56E8985A.1020509@nod.at> <20160316142156.GA23595@node.shutemov.name> <20160316142729.GA125481@black.fi.intel.com> <56E9C658.1020903@nod.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4268 Lines: 69 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:47:20 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote: > Adding more CC's. > > Am 16.03.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >>> Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > >>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >>>>>> Or if ->page_mkwrite() was called, why the page is not dirty? > >>>>> > >>>>> BTW: UBIFS does not implement ->migratepage(), could this be a problem? > >>>> > >>>> This might be the reason. I can't reall make sense of > >>>> buffer_migrate_page, but it seems to migrate buffer_head state to > >>>> the new page. > >>>> > >>>> I'd love to know why CMA even tries to migrate pages that don't have a > >>>> ->migratepage method, this seems incredibly dangerous to me. > >>> > >>> FYI, with a dummy ->migratepage() which returns only -EINVAL UBIFS does no > >>> longer explode upon page migration. > >>> Tomorrow I'll do more tests to make sure. > >> > >> Could you check if something like this would fix the issue. > > Nope. > > [ 108.080000] BUG: Bad page state in process drm-stress-test pfn:5c674 > [ 108.080000] page:deb8ce80 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 > [ 108.090000] flags: 0x810(dirty|private) > [ 108.100000] page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set > [ 108.100000] bad because of flags: > [ 108.110000] flags: 0x800(private) > [ 108.110000] Modules linked in: > [ 108.120000] CPU: 0 PID: 1855 Comm: drm-stress-test Not tainted 4.4.4-gaae1ad1-dirty #14 > [ 108.120000] Hardware name: Allwinner sun4i/sun5i Families > [ 108.120000] [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [ 108.120000] [] (show_stack) from [] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xa0) > [ 108.120000] [] (dump_stack) from [] (bad_page+0xcc/0x11c) > [ 108.120000] [] (bad_page) from [] (free_pages_prepare+0x22c/0x2f4) > [ 108.120000] [] (free_pages_prepare) from [] (free_hot_cold_page+0x34/0x194) > [ 108.120000] [] (free_hot_cold_page) from [] (free_hot_cold_page_list+0x48/0xdc) > [ 108.120000] [] (free_hot_cold_page_list) from [] (release_pages+0x1dc/0x224) > [ 108.120000] [] (release_pages) from [] (pagevec_lru_move_fn+0xe8/0xf8) > [ 108.120000] [] (pagevec_lru_move_fn) from [] (__lru_cache_add+0x60/0x88) > [ 108.120000] [] (__lru_cache_add) from [] (putback_lru_page+0x68/0xbc) > [ 108.120000] [] (putback_lru_page) from [] (migrate_pages+0x208/0x730) > [ 108.120000] [] (migrate_pages) from [] (alloc_contig_range+0x168/0x2f4) > [ 108.120000] [] (alloc_contig_range) from [] (cma_alloc+0x170/0x2c0) > [ 108.120000] [] (cma_alloc) from [] (__alloc_from_contiguous+0x38/0xd8) > [ 108.120000] [] (__alloc_from_contiguous) from [] (__dma_alloc+0x234/0x278) > [ 108.120000] [] (__dma_alloc) from [] (arm_dma_alloc+0x54/0x5c) > [ 108.120000] [] (arm_dma_alloc) from [] (drm_gem_cma_create+0x9c/0xf0) > [ 108.120000] [] (drm_gem_cma_create) from [] (drm_gem_cma_create_with_handle+0x1c/0xe8) > [ 108.120000] [] (drm_gem_cma_create_with_handle) from [] (drm_gem_cma_dumb_create+0x3c/0x48) > [ 108.120000] [] (drm_gem_cma_dumb_create) from [] (drm_ioctl+0x12c/0x440) > [ 108.120000] [] (drm_ioctl) from [] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x3f4/0x614) > [ 108.120000] [] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [] (SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x5c) > [ 108.120000] [] (SyS_ioctl) from [] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x34) > > It is still not clear why UBIFS has to provide a >migratepage() and what the expected semantics > are. > What we know so far is that the fall back migration function is broken. I'm sure not only on UBIFS. > The above says "PagePrivate was still set", and UBIFS does muck with PagePrivate. Perhaps the fs isn't clearing things up in all the right places.