Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 03:40:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 03:40:29 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:19413 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 03:40:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:50:45 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Morton , Alex Tomas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Message-ID: <20030316085045.GN1399@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Morton , Alex Tomas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20030315135158.6d5fef1a.akpm@digeo.com> <20030315220618.GY20188@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030315220618.GY20188@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 24 On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a >> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that >> sometime? On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:06:18PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Benching now. Sorry, this should have hit the list earlier. Throughput 294.388 MB/sec 128 procs dbench 128 87.22s user 4286.79s system 2984% cpu 2:26.58 total (the "before" picture was ca. 257MB/s) vmstat and oprofile info vanished, not sure why. A rerun is possible. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/