Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262658AbTCPLq5>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 06:46:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262659AbTCPLq5>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 06:46:57 -0500
Received: from pasky.ji.cz ([62.44.12.54]:16118 "HELO machine.sinus.cz")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S262658AbTCPLqz>;
	Sun, 16 Mar 2003 06:46:55 -0500
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:57:46 +0100
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
To: Robert Anderson <rwa@alumni.princeton.edu>,
       Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       arch <arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net>
Subject: (Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone) Moving to arch-users
Message-ID: <20030316115746.GC11761@pasky.ji.cz>
Mail-Followup-To: Robert Anderson <rwa@alumni.princeton.edu>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	arch <arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net>
References: <200303151621.h2FGLgaD003246@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <20030315212205.CDE923D979@mx01.nexgo.de> <1047765218.9619.124.camel@lan1> <20030316001840.GB11761@pasky.ji.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030316001840.GB11761@pasky.ji.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too.
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1950
Lines: 49

Dear diary, on Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 01:18:40AM CET, I got a letter,
where Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> told me, that...
> Dear diary, on Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:53:34PM CET, I got a letter,
> where Robert Anderson <rwa@alumni.princeton.edu> told me, that...
> > On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 13:25, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Sat 15 Mar 03 17:21, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > > > Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> said:
> > > > > On Thu 13 Mar 03 01:52, Horst von Brand wrote:
> ..snip..
> > > > > Does anybody have a convenient mailing list for this design discussion?
> > > >
> > > > Good idea to move this off LKML
> > > 
> > > Yup, but nobody has offered one yet, so...
> > 
> > I think the arch-users@lists.fifthvision.net list would be happy to host
> > continuing discussion in this vein.  Considering Larry's repeated
> > attempts to get people to look at arch as a "better fit," it seems
> > particularly appropriate.
> > 
> > Of course, you'd have to tolerate "arch community" views on a lot of
> > these issues, but I suspect that might help focus the discussion.
> 
> I'm not sure if arch is the right thing to base on. Its concepts are surely
> interesting, however there are several problems (some of them may be
> subjective):
..rant..

Ok, from a perspective of few hours I think it's a good idea to really move
this discussion to arch-users, although the resulting SCM may not be
neccessarily arch. I will strip lkml from the recipients list in my further
mails replying to this sub-thread and I would like to ask the others to do the
same.

Kind regards,

-- 
 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
.
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
		-- Oscar Wilde
.
Stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/