Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759405AbcCVOdb (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:33:31 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:32972 "EHLO mail-oi0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758720AbcCVOdX (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:33:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <8760wnfe3r.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <8737rrfe1f.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: IPSRx and MOD_SELx should be set before GPSRx From: Linus Walleij To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus , Simon , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 474 Lines: 16 On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> I wait for Geert to either queue this for his first v4.7 pull request >> or tell me to apply it for fixes. Is it a regression? > > I'm not aware of any issues due to this. OK just queue it with the rest. I assume there will still be lots of action in sh-pfc for this merge window. Yours, Linus Walleij