Subject: Re: UFS V11 patch-set
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
References: <56EBF966.8040907@synopsys.com> <56EBF9FD.9080906@synopsys.com>
 <4014649.ENvamPh3sb@wuerfel> <56EC1675.2050002@synopsys.com>
 <56EFCCB3.3040108@synopsys.com> <56F11F00.1060408@synopsys.com>
 <20160322105827.GB2566@sirena.org.uk> <56F126B9.3010903@synopsys.com>
 <20160322153125.GC2566@sirena.org.uk>
CC: vinayak holikatti <vinholikatti@gmail.com>, <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
        <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Carlos Palminha" <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>,
        <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "robh@kernel.org >> Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Message-ID: <56F1674A.3090309@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:39:54 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160322153125.GC2566@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1172
Lines: 27

On 3/22/2016 3:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:04:25AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:
> 
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.
> 
>> I have no intend to break the rules. I am just trying to communicate with UFS
>> maintainers that so far gave me no response. Merging in v4.7 is fine, but I
>> would like that UFS maintainers give me some feedback about the next steps, but
>> so far didn't have luck.
> 
> Like I say the next steps are those Arnd gave you: repost after -rc1.
> Then give people at least a week or so to respond, people do get busy
> and other people are also sending patches.
> 

Understood, I will repost this patch set after -rc1.
I suggest that the UFS maintenance should be revised because the e-mail of
ufshcd.c authors are no longer valid and the current maintainer (Vinayak
Holikatti) is having a career shift (has you can check in LinkedIn) and probably
is not available at the moment to do patch reviews.

Thanks,
Joao