Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753037AbcCVRKR (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:10:17 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:34473 "EHLO mail-lf0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326AbcCVRKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:10:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] ACPI: parse SPCR and enable matching console To: Yury Norov , Peter Hurley References: <1458643595-14719-1-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <1458643595-14719-4-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <20160322122650.GA10616@yury-N73SV> <56F15D40.9020401@hurleysoftware.com> <20160322165122.GB10616@yury-N73SV> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , Leif Lindholm , Graeme Gregory , Al Stone , Christopher Covington , "Zheng, Lv" , Jiri Slaby From: Aleksey Makarov Message-ID: <56F17BF3.7090608@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:08:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160322165122.GB10616@yury-N73SV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1652 Lines: 63 On 03/22/2016 07:51 PM, Yury Norov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 07:57:04AM -0700, Peter Hurley wrote: > > [...] > >>>> +static bool init_earlycon; >>>> + >>>> +void __init init_spcr_earlycon(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + init_earlycon = true; >>>> +} >>>> + >>> >>> 1. I see you keep in mind multiple access. >> >> Concurrent access is not a concern here: only the boot cpu is running >> and intrs are off. >> >> The "init_earlycon" flag is used because parsing the "earlycon" early param >> is earlier than parsing ACPI tables. >> > > OK got it. My concern is that it's generic code, and parse_spcr() is public > function. I think corresponding comment is needed at least. The other option is > to make it race-safe and forget. I prefer second one, moreover it's 2 simple > changes. I would not call this function public. It is made non-static only to allow callin it from another compilation unit. It should be called only once at initializatioin time. I will add a comment about this, thank you. >> Then you'd worry about race >>> conditions as well. In this case, I'd consider atomic access to >>> variable. >>> 2. It seems you need is_init() helper too. >>> >>>> +int __init parse_spcr(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + static char opts[64]; >>>> + struct acpi_table_spcr *table; >>>> + acpi_size table_size; >>>> + acpi_status status; >>>> + char *uart; >>>> + char *iotype; >>>> + int baud_rate; >>>> + int err = 0; >>> >>> You can do not initialize 'err'. >> >> Why? >> > > Because there's no path here that doesn't init err with some value. > So this initialization is useless waste of cycles. > > [...] I agree, will fix this. Thank you Aleksey