Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:38:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:38:15 -0500 Received: from ns.miraclelinux.com ([219.101.34.26]:38652 "EHLO dns01.miraclelinux.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:38:14 -0500 To: rddunlap@osdl.org Cc: jamagallon@able.es, mikpe@user.it.uu.se, perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com Subject: Re: [Perfctr-devel] Re: perfctr-2.5.0 released In-Reply-To: <33207.4.64.238.61.1047616615.squirrel@www.osdl.org> References: <200303110002.h2B02Uxa025848@harpo.it.uu.se> <20030314012502.GA20357@werewolf.able.es> <33207.4.64.238.61.1047616615.squirrel@www.osdl.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on XEmacs 21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20030317014736O.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:47:36 +0900 From: Hiro Yoshioka X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1877 Lines: 43 Hi, We have made a memory profiling tool based on the perfctr 2.5.0. http://downloads.sourceforge.jp/hardmeter/2646/hardmeter-030314.tar.gz The tool (hardmeter) is 1) patch to perfctr 2.5.0 2) ebs (PEBS (Precise Event Based Sampling) memory profiling tool) 3) API Thanks, Hiro > > > > On 03.11, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > >> Version 2.5.0 of perfctr, the Linux/x86 performance > >> monitoring counters driver, is now available at the usual > >> place: http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/perfctr/ > >> > > > > Perhaps this has been asked for a million times, but I'm new to > > perfctrs... > > Is there any tool available to profile a program based on this ? > > I have seen perfex, but that gives total counts. I would like something like > > gprof... We are now optimizing some software and I would like to make my > > colleagues leave Windows (they use Intel's VTune) and go to Linux. > > Or at least compare the same kind of things between VTune on win and > > 'something' in Linux that also uses the counters. They don't seem to trust > > gprof. And, looking at the results, I'm beginning to untrust VTune... > > I hope that Mikael knows of some native Linux tools for this. > However, Intel did announce Vtune for Linux recently (might still be > in beta test), and there was a SuSE patch for it posted at > kernelnewbies.org also. See: > > http://www.linuxhardware.org/comments.pl?sid=364&cid=530 > http://www.linuxhardware.org/articles/03/01/17/1633229.shtml > http://kernelnewbies.org/kernels/SuSE81/SOURCES/patches.i386/50_vtune-ia32 > (warning: this is for 2.4.19) > > or google for "+vtune +linux". > > ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/