Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262705AbTCPRwv>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:52:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262706AbTCPRwv>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:52:51 -0500
Received: from msp-24-163-212-250.mn.rr.com ([24.163.212.250]:16009 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262705AbTCPRwu>; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:52:50 -0500
Subject: constant Bitkeeper bitching
From: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1047837820.3966.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 16 Mar 2003 12:03:40 -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 948
Lines: 23

Holy frelling frig-fest on a freighter of fruit-loops!

I've never seen such ridiculous behavior.. Well, except all the time on
LK...

Anyway, folks, keep in mind the following. BK->CVS does not throw away
any useful meta-data you would have had before using BK. You had
patches, folks... That's it!! BK giveth, and giveth, and giveth, and all
you see is taking away.

Whatever your thoughts on Larry, or the language in his license, you get
to take the data out, sans only the metadata cvs cannot handle. Plus,
you get much more granular history tracking you ever had with patches.

Now go sit and spin. I am neither a detractor or protractor... ;] I'm
just sick of the bitching, as is everyone else.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/