Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:43:56 -0500 Received: from modemcable166.48-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.48.166]:23199 "EHLO xanadu.home") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:43:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:54:33 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Roman Zippel cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Ben Collins , lkml Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BK->CVS (real time mirror) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 33 On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > true but the missing bits are nearly worthless, I wouldn't be ok with > > CVS if this wasn't the case. I mean, in the very worst case, we're not > > totally screwed, we probably won't even notice the difference. > > The missing bits are absolutely not worthless. They are very useful when > you want to test other SCM system to simulate distributed development. This is completely ridiculous. Isn't this a bit too demanding? What will be next? Be realistic. The missing bits are worthless and add absolutely no value to kernel development which is supposed to be the topic for this mailing list. It's not the missing bits that will prevent you from making a better alternative to BK or whatever either. If it really does you should consider spending your time on another project. But since I truly believe you are more clever than that I suspect you're just trying to stretch the issue out of reasonable bounds because of your political beliefs. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/