Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754182AbcCWI0v (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:26:51 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39866 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753670AbcCWI0s (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:26:48 -0400 Subject: Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test To: Joonsoo Kim References: <56E2FB5C.1040602@suse.cz> <20160314064925.GA27587@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56E662E8.700@suse.cz> <20160314071803.GA28094@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56E92AFC.9050208@huawei.com> <20160317065426.GA10315@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56EA77BC.2090702@huawei.com> <56EAD0B4.2060807@suse.cz> <56EC0C41.70503@suse.cz> <20160323044407.GB4624@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Cc: Hanjun Guo , "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" , Laura Abbott , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Sasha Levin , Laura Abbott , qiuxishi , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , dingtinahong , chenjie6@huawei.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Lucas Stach From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: <56F25343.8010100@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:26:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160323044407.GB4624@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 20 On 03/23/2016 05:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> >> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock") >> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/280 >> Reported-by: Hanjun Guo >> Debugged-by: Laura Abbott >> Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim >> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka >> Cc: # 3.18+ >> --- >> mm/page_alloc.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim > > Thanks for taking care of this issue!. Thanks for the review. But I'm now not sure whether we push this to mainline+stable now, and later replace with Lucas' approach, or whether that approach would be also suitable and non-disruptive enough for stable?