Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754241AbcCWIcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:33596 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753909AbcCWIcp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 04:32:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F25343.8010100@suse.cz> References: <56E2FB5C.1040602@suse.cz> <20160314064925.GA27587@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56E662E8.700@suse.cz> <20160314071803.GA28094@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56E92AFC.9050208@huawei.com> <20160317065426.GA10315@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56EA77BC.2090702@huawei.com> <56EAD0B4.2060807@suse.cz> <56EC0C41.70503@suse.cz> <20160323044407.GB4624@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <56F25343.8010100@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:32:43 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test From: Joonsoo Kim To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Joonsoo Kim , Hanjun Guo , "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" , Laura Abbott , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Sasha Levin , Laura Abbott , qiuxishi , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , dingtinahong , chenjie6@huawei.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Lucas Stach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1161 Lines: 31 2016-03-23 17:26 GMT+09:00 Vlastimil Babka : > On 03/23/2016 05:44 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >>> >>> >>> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on >>> isolated pageblock") >>> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/280 >>> Reported-by: Hanjun Guo >>> Debugged-by: Laura Abbott >>> Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim >>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka >>> Cc: # 3.18+ >>> --- >>> mm/page_alloc.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> >> Acked-by: Joonsoo Kim >> >> Thanks for taking care of this issue!. > > > Thanks for the review. But I'm now not sure whether we push this to > mainline+stable now, and later replace with Lucas' approach, or whether that > approach would be also suitable and non-disruptive enough for stable? Lucas' approach is for improvement and would be complex rather than this. I don't think it would be appropriate for stable. IMO, it's better to push this to mainline + stable now. Thanks.