Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:41:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:41:48 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:31493 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:41:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3A947C54.E4750E74@transmeta.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:41:24 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Dilger CC: Daniel Phillips , Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 In-Reply-To: <200102220203.f1M237Z20870@webber.adilger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Basically (IMHO) we will not really get any noticable benefit with 1 level > index blocks for a 1k filesystem - my estimates at least are that the break > even point is about 5k files. We _should_ be OK with 780k files in a single > directory for a while. > I've had a news server with 2000000 files in one directory. Such a filesystem is likely to use small blocks, too, because each file is generally small. This is an important connection: filesystems which have lots and lots of small files will have large directories and small block sizes. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/