Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:46:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:46:39 -0500 Received: from polaris.cis.ksu.edu ([129.130.10.93]:58833 "EHLO polaris.cis.ksu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:46:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 20:47:36 -0600 (CST) From: Matt Stegman To: Neil Brown cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: partitions for RAID volumes? In-Reply-To: <14996.16520.832011.18@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday February 21, Wilfried.Weissmann@gmx.at wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any chance that RAID volumes would support partitions like the > > hard-disk driver in the future? > > Yep. > See: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux/2.4.2-pre4/ > > You would need patches H,I,N,O,P,Q,R, and you should consider this a > very early release, but it works for me. > ... > Using this, I can RAID1 hda and hdc together as md0 == mda and then > partition it up as mda1 (root) mda2 (swap) mda3 (other). And if I > have too, I can boot off either drive individually with any raid > happening. Is there any particular reason to prefer this over LVM? With 2.4, LVM can be a layer atop of software RAID, allowing for multiple volumes, online volume resizing, and other cool things. -Matt Stegman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/