Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:03:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:03:26 -0500 Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca ([199.212.134.11]:3853 "EHLO avscan1.sentex.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: <078701c2ec1a$6e98aec0$294b82ce@connecttech.com> From: "Stuart MacDonald" To: "Mark Mielke" , "Vlad@geekizoid.com" Cc: "'Pavel Machek'" , "'kernel list'" , , References: <20030314105132.GB14270@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <006401c2ea36$b4ac27b0$0200a8c0@wsl3> <20030314161309.GC1671@mark.mielke.cc> Subject: Re: Never ever send Pavel private mail unless you want him to publish it. Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:16:02 -0500 Organization: Connect Tech Inc. X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 20 From: "Mark Mielke" > Also, the last time I > tried to defend maintaining the privacy of an email, I lost. There are > simply no rules about any of it. The closest would be copyright law, > and even then, as long as the email is attributed, it is a hard stance > to make. I'm under the impression that postcards do not carry an expectation of privacy due to their readability during transmission. I'd expect that email would be found to have the similar lack of expectation were it to be tested in court. ..Stu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/