Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756737AbcCWUiI (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:38:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:50196 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752173AbcCWUiH (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:38:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160323115457.GC17838@8bytes.org> References: <1458669509-7178-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <20160323115457.GC17838@8bytes.org> From: Rob Herring Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:37:44 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Grant Likely , Will Deacon , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux IOMMU , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Joerg Roedel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 589 Lines: 18 On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:45:41PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> > Please review. Patches are based on v4.5. >> >> Other than my one comment, this looks good to me. For the series: >> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring > > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree > probably makes more sense. Sure, I can take them. Rob