Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:21:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:21:12 -0500 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:56552 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:21:11 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Joshua Kwan Subject: Re: Weirdness with 2.4.20-ck4 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:32:02 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: linux-kernel mailing list References: <20030316201124.GA2849@triplehelix.org> <200303171509.34696.kernel@kolivas.org> <20030317041553.GA1186@triplehelix.org> In-Reply-To: <20030317041553.GA1186@triplehelix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303171732.02778.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 21 On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:15, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 03:09:23PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Using it on a server box? You should reverse patch the desktop tuning > > (patch 010) at the very least. Your throughput will be higher without > > that and it may well be responsible for the hang. > > I'm running 2.4.20-rmap15e for now, but I'm quite sure I only had 001, > 002, and 003. > > 001_o1_pe_ll_030206_ck_2.4.20.patch.bz2 > 002_aavm_030226_ck_2.4.20.patch.bz2 > 003_rl2_021215_ck.2.4.20.patch.bz2 Ok. Well I don't recommend the rl2 patch, but I would recommend the first two. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/