Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 04:36:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 04:36:01 -0500 Received: from poup.poupinou.org ([195.101.94.96]:17412 "EHLO poup.poupinou.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 04:36:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:46:51 +0100 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Ducrot Bruno , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5 XFree and nvidia geforce. Message-ID: <20030317094651.GB8814@poup.poupinou.org> References: <3E70086B.6080408@lemur.sytes.net> <20030313201624.GA29107@suse.de> <20030313231615.07563914.bonganilinux@mweb.co.za> <200303132155.h2DLtsRU015899@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20030314194050.GA8814@poup.poupinou.org> <200303142244.h2EMi0b4025022@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303142244.h2EMi0b4025022@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Ducrot Bruno Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2103 Lines: 48 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 05:44:00PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:40:50 +0100, Ducrot Bruno said: > > > One of the main issue for me (I don't want flame please) is > > that it kill acpi and/or apm. Since it's more important for > > for me to get suspension working, I can not use any > > drivers provided by nVidia unless of course they implement > > No flames intended - I just have different requirements than you do, > and suspending hasn't been an issue for me, and I've not bothered > trying to get it to work. > > I've seen a workaround posted for the nvidia suspend issue - the trick was to > configure a suspend script that apmd/whatever would call, and include > a '/usr/bin/chvt 1' in it. So on the way down, it would change off the > nvidia-controlled VT, and all would be well. No. I spoke for a missing function in the binary part (was present in 15.., but removed in 20.. and 28..) )... > > > BTW, XFree4.3.0 is out, and your GeForce is supported. > > Oh, the free driver has "supported" the card for ages. My point was that (a) > the free driver isn't 2-d accelerated as much as the NVidia driver (the 'nv' > free driver can average 10-15% CPU by itself, and the 'nvidia' closed driver > only 1-2% while feeling much quicker), and (b) the NVidia driver "just works" > in finding the video port on the docking station when I'm docked - the 'nv' > free drivers would find the LCD screen fine and not find the docking port > video. ... and seem that this function is now reintroduced in the lasted release in the nvidia binary. I guess that more work has to be done, though, but I consider that my really lastest complain about the binary driver from nvidia go now to /dev/null. Cheers, -- Ducrot Bruno http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/