Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752515AbcCXSMJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:12:09 -0400 Received: from us01smtprelay-2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:43291 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbcCXSMG (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:12:06 -0400 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Joao Pinto Subject: kbuild test robot: Interest in the subject CC: Carlos Palminha Message-ID: <56F42DF0.5050807@synopsys.com> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:12:00 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.13.184.19] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 498 Lines: 14 Hello! I would like to implement something similar to the kernel's kbuild test robot in my development process. Could you please tell me if the automation process and architecture are documented for easy replication? I know that there is a great variety of kernel validation tools (autotest, kselftests, ktest, etc.) and helper scripts but I would like to use a structure similar to the one used by the kernel community for more accurate results. Thanks for your attention. Best regards, -Joao