Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:23:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:23:22 -0500 Received: from comtv.ru ([217.10.32.4]:16854 "EHLO comtv.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:23:21 -0500 X-Comment-To: Matthew Wilcox To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] distributed counters for ext2 to avoid group scaning References: <20030316104447.D12806@schatzie.adilger.int> <20030317151108.GC28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030317152719.GD28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> From: Alex Tomas Organization: HOME Date: 17 Mar 2003 18:25:50 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20030317152719.GD28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 18 >>>>> Matthew Wilcox (MW) writes: MW> Gah. That's your fault. Use diff -p in future; I saw: thanks for advice. I will. MW> which makes it look like the dcounters are added to ext2_bg_info. MW> diff -p would have put the name of the struct after the @@ line. MW> Not to mention you didn't follow the `s_' prefix style used MW> everywhere else in that struct. this makes sense too. MW> Anyway, I think dcounters should probably be allocated from MW> kmalloc_percpu() rather than as part of the dcounter struct. take a look. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/