Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751526AbcCYAPT (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 20:15:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:49547 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750797AbcCYAPR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 20:15:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:15:09 +0100 From: Sebastian Reichel To: Jani Nikula Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Aaro Koskinen , Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Tomi Valkeinen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] ARM: dts: n950: add display support Message-ID: <20160325001509.GA12097@earth> References: <1457455195-1938-1-git-send-email-sre@kernel.org> <1457455195-1938-3-git-send-email-sre@kernel.org> <21766689.NesyW3QHk4@avalon> <20160317174901.GB3864@earth> <87lh59pdt6.fsf@intel.com> <20160323140105.GA31703@earth> <87h9fwdwh6.fsf@intel.com> <20160324142652.GA25083@earth> <87io0b52ss.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87io0b52ss.fsf@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2263 Lines: 66 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > As I said: I did use 864 initially. That results in missing pixels. >=20 > Sorry, I didn't mean to question this. Go with what works, not with some > old fart's ramblings! No problem. I also wondered why this has been done. If I understood Tomi right, the userspace team feared, that their software would not work with 864, since it was originally written for 854. Anyways I'm pretty sure, that the first 5 pixels are unusable =66rom the users point of view. > > I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the > > last few pixels of the 864 display with plastic. So technically > > it's a 864 display, but effectively it's 854. >=20 > (*shudder* at "your HW team" ;) ;) > It's plausible, the covers did change slightly for the developer > edition. Assuming the non-developer edition can use the full display it can be "unlocked" with my proposed DT bindings by slight modifications. I guess there exist just a couple of those, so maybe we just ignore it for the mainline kernel? > Good luck with the upstreaming efforts! Thanks. -- Sebastian --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW9IMHAAoJENju1/PIO/qa9hoQAJoMSQfgwkdaghXGN6xJ5lv2 vY9vTm9BCklLa2iSv/J4XrR082tZ/T6ZZ2HS165mXVBbCkeItQSgh94shU30Eb5u oW/0bQPtJUnPFXTk5lUQgW3eY5VnyVHxYGffPOF/rSilGyHRYvWTSiUMuf/mF37w ezD6tOl0zsXIcLsH1Fof3IsOEwpQjfeskA7zJ9v/dNNzP76HKaaTQBLn4bSCpYBt +ySMyIncAju5Fr1LgC/QpLjSxauZEO6edKnfmvGZIzsqOg2Y0mKWn3ki/1jNyoay vqdUCTTMFSIWEgw49VpYobacChtcbQ48/wuuuiBdDhi1L7YEKv2ZeSRyG6tthSdA 0nxAmGAwC/Lhp2o3qs2/dtIF2sefftvffzPabPppRu7Uyro3M58wfnKBOyL4364r 5tNsyfY0kD0I2yYLmBmAfMNY4So6ktpsXdmkYpm4ZWaOtIq6Hf3oJGtbty+0gQax +027ji/Vtf8FDI2g/0gFTI0Wr7r+ZeWx27ur+ccw+LjYX11hyQ5PyJX0EF2jVllY 3azCH/ExuBP2mvAoXgS2/NpAX2Aplj15N1r0N8mCwaiC+sB/KQhqO3J5LGSUhUUW RrswEpaBoXTgpUk6pWTBscFP6VgQlhtrXkSsze/gckgfuFmjaan4Lz84rH3tGLho h5kOWkRVUvXXcaezw+/y =OG+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--