Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:50:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:50:55 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-bos.redhat.com ([66.187.230.200]:39080 "EHLO chimarrao.boston.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:50:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:01:31 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: William Lee Irwin III cc: Paul Albrecht , Subject: Re: 2.4 vm, program load, page faulting, ... In-Reply-To: <20030317151004.GR20188@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 25 On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Paul Albrecht wrote: > >> ... Why does the kernel page fault on text pages, present in the page > >> cache, when a program starts? Couldn't the pte's for text present in the > >> page cache be resolved when they're mapped to memory? > > SVR4 did and saw an improvement wrt. page fault rate, according to > Vahalia. An improvement in the _page fault rate_, well DUH. > I'd like to see whether this is useful for Linux. The question is, does it result in an improvement in the run speed of processes... cheers, Rik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/