Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge
 configuration"
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
References: <1458849121-11242-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
 <20160325111050.GB2566@sirena.org.uk>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Message-ID: <56F550B0.7050602@mentor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:52:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160325111050.GB2566@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 901
Lines: 28

On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This reverts commit 909f7ee0b5f30f735e16864a7ed18d2e6123e6d9.
>>
>> Apparently due to a wrongly resolved merge conflict between two
>> branches, which contained the same commit, the commit contents
>> partially was added two times in a row.
> 
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches.
> 

Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75667.html

RMK:

    I think it's sensible to keep at least the summary line of
    a 'git revert' intact rather than inventing our own.

That discussion was about a8cf81ffe028 '(Revert "[ARM] unconditionally
define __virt_to_phys and __phys_to_virt")'

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir