Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754138AbcCYRG1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:06:27 -0400 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:52660 "EHLO relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753321AbcCYRGZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:06:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: core: Add support for active-discharge configuration" To: Mark Brown References: <1458849121-11242-1-git-send-email-vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> <20160325111050.GB2566@sirena.org.uk> <56F550B0.7050602@mentor.com> <20160325154507.GG2566@sirena.org.uk> CC: Liam Girdwood , Laxman Dewangan , , Russell King From: Vladimir Zapolskiy Message-ID: <56F5700D.2000105@mentor.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:06:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160325154507.GG2566@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.76] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1423 Lines: 39 Mark, On 25.03.2016 17:45, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> On 25.03.2016 13:10, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the >>> subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant >>> patches. > >> Okay, submitting of reverted patches is different I believe: > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg75667.html > > Nope, they're patches like other patches. A big part of what the > subject line does is help people work out what they need to look at, > something that doesn't pattern match doesn't fulfil that need. > regarding pattern matching just remove ^ from the regexp and people be aware of this "regulator: core" change. I understand that the reverted commit is a maintainer's fault and by renaming the subject you may hide it, so talking about people needs please let them know that the change _reverts_ another commit. I can not add Fixes: tag, because the change does not fix a commit, and there is no Reverts: tag due to its obvious redundancy. Please look at 1 hour old 1701f680407c ("Revert "ppdev: use new parport device model" ") --- that's IMHO the proper way to create and apply reverts. And I disagree with the modified subject and commit message done by you and without a notice mentioning this your change in the commit message. -- With best wishes, Vladimir