Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753683AbcCZTDq (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:03:46 -0400 Received: from gagarine.paulk.fr ([109.190.93.129]:58288 "EHLO gagarine.paulk.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751606AbcCZTDo (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2016 15:03:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1459019060.971.3.camel@paulk.fr> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Add localdefconfig helper From: Paul Kocialkowski To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , "Yann E . MORIN" Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 20:04:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160326185306.GA4133@ravnborg.org> References: <1459017087-11640-1-git-send-email-contact@paulk.fr> <20160326185306.GA4133@ravnborg.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mJeRj/Oz1BRckw1neVaj" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2317 Lines: 65 --=-mJeRj/Oz1BRckw1neVaj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le samedi 26 mars 2016 =C3=A0 19:53 +0100, Sam Ravnborg a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 07:31:27PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > >=20 > > This introduces a localdefconfig make target to specify out-of-tree def= ault > > configs. The out-of-tree default target is selected by defining > > KBUILD_LOCALDEFCONFIG in the make command line. > >=20 > > The intent of this change is to easily allow using default configs that= are > > not > > part of the kernel source (e.g. for a specific device or use case), wit= hout > > ever > > touching the kernel source tree. > >=20 > Does this differ from what you can achieve with KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG? > See Documentation/kbuild/kconfig.txt >=20 > From a quick glance the functionality is the same. It looks like my suggestion is equivalent to specifying KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG a= nd running the alldefconfig target, indeed! Thanks for pointing this out, I suppose this patch can be disregarded then. Cheers, --=20 Paul Kocialkowski, low-level free software developer on embedded devices Website: https://www.paulk.fr/ Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/ Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/ --=-mJeRj/Oz1BRckw1neVaj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJW9t01AAoJEIT9weqP7pUM1OcP/AzKHr5gjlMKNPPmAQ954Al7 uGSxidO02uso+1N8VmJndIlYaifl2qsQWnOnpJG1QbT+Xaa8qUud/D/M9juCCA/1 pvoH/fYDV7aOeb6WR7nNmE2hp1IDIpJvVmGIFk5yS12YY0uX/eYmiunbS6/DASe3 V6jfNNZETbxRoitggm+2s4cg17GI37LY41RzAN9lBQZlIPXEWpppVeK0wV6P36BR KMwN0xi11p/e6Q/BveM21lah+OS6nFYu1rE7lf+yvW9Zg6blX5BbMAkY2jPlnlGE OpNSsdUEcMjbR1Hesd2RKAPWdQY/llqwh3Vrgy5fqCGY/izNtaX0QzmP3rmyGts0 eGiCFSkUZOrN+QpGIgOH6mlalL3J0Zyrgk56E2zNRm3SuXqJDE1oIgPDYCh8AVGH ZUupu+UIknaq/X8FMv/N7o+zclFE7sWXzNyg/AXMG3KedgL+34mX9OaQmB5WcVha akTQYJ5f+zdOI+2nYRze9sDs4mP8g6ojb5gTQb/zahlGbDgfumyW5XQQKuiIjacy X2dnxrOVqlUPxbBulrfB/lLZD2TtBWZ6mREvZ9kfOdem/SPZ4CcvUskgqCEwcMyi ONSgZn+WAxiVrVnBEBCPEiTIuyvScosRm+xYOQ+0Gs3nMxJRRWVXveHZ+gbFlxkc M2ZctPUERNJegJn7SPN2 =iPCz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mJeRj/Oz1BRckw1neVaj--