Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:17:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:17:02 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:50816 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:16:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:27:41 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Alan Cox Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 Message-ID: <20030317182741.GB2145@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <200303171604.h2HG4Zc30291@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1047923841.1600.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20030317182040.GA2145@louise.pinerecords.com> <1047929671.24510.15.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047929671.24510.15.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 871 Lines: 23 > [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk] > > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:20, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > Is this critical enough for 2.4.21 to go out? Or can it wait like > > some other fairly serious stuff such as the ext3 fixes? What about > > the current state of IDE? > > > > Would it make sense to repackage 2.4.20 into something like 2.4.20-p1 > > or 2.4.20.1 with only the critical stuff applied? > > If you build your own kernels apply the patch, if you use vendor kernels > then you can expect vendor kernel updates to appear or have already > appeared You have avoided the question(s). 8) -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/