Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:27:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:27:16 -0500 Received: from gw.lowendale.com.au ([203.26.242.120]:20604 "EHLO marina.lowendale.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:27:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:23:41 +1100 (EST) From: Neale Banks To: Tomas Szepe cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 In-Reply-To: <20030317182741.GB2145@louise.pinerecords.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1117 Lines: 32 On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk] > > > > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:20, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > > Is this critical enough for 2.4.21 to go out? Or can it wait like > > > some other fairly serious stuff such as the ext3 fixes? What about > > > the current state of IDE? > > > > > > Would it make sense to repackage 2.4.20 into something like 2.4.20-p1 > > > or 2.4.20.1 with only the critical stuff applied? > > > > If you build your own kernels apply the patch, if you use vendor kernels > > then you can expect vendor kernel updates to appear or have already > > appeared > > You have avoided the question(s). 8) I think Alan's trying to teach us how to fish ;-) That said, IMVHO something like this does constitute an argument for 2.4.20-p1 (due to the amount of change that's already racked up for 2.2.21). Regards, Neale. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/