Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:13:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:13:49 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:8120 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:13:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:23:57 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: bzzz@tmi.comex.ru, willy@debian.org, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] distributed counters for ext2 to avoid group scaning Message-Id: <20030317122357.41df48a9.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030317152719.GD28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030316104447.D12806@schatzie.adilger.int> <20030317151108.GC28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030317152719.GD28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2003 20:23:54.0449 (UTC) FILETIME=[217E2C10:01C2ECC3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 18 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Anyway, I think dcounters should probably be allocated from kmalloc_percpu() > rather than as part of the dcounter struct. That will still consume up to 4 kilobytes per 32-bit counter. We'd need to merge Kiran & Dipankar's interlace allocator to do this less grossly. Which is why I'm waiting to see some profiles and benchmarks. Judging from the last set of profiles, in which ext2_count_free_blocks() was not present, this may not be justified. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/