Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:37:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:37:52 -0500 Received: from comtv.ru ([217.10.32.4]:35549 "EHLO comtv.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:37:51 -0500 X-Comment-To: Andrew Morton To: Andrew Morton Cc: Matthew Wilcox , adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] distributed counters for ext2 to avoid group scaning References: <20030316104447.D12806@schatzie.adilger.int> <20030317151108.GC28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030317152719.GD28607@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030317122357.41df48a9.akpm@digeo.com> From: Alex Tomas Organization: HOME Date: 17 Mar 2003 23:40:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20030317122357.41df48a9.akpm@digeo.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 18 hi! >>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes: AM> Which is why I'm waiting to see some profiles and benchmarks. AM> Judging from the last set of profiles, in which AM> ext2_count_free_blocks() was not present, this may not be AM> justified. first of all, ext2_count_free_blocks() is used by orlov allocator only which in turn is used to create dirs only. so, I do not think dbench may show possible improvement. also, I understand it isn't bottleneck absolutely, but I think it may reduce memory footprint. Probably, we may use dcounters for huge fs only (i.e. make it optional). with best regards, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/