Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755138AbcC1MwH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:52:07 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:42228 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755111AbcC1MwF (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:52:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Tests for sync infrastructure To: Shuah Khan References: <1457537342-678-1-git-send-email-emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk> <56E04B8C.7000504@osg.samsung.com> Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Gustavo Padovan , Riley Andrews , Daniel Vetter , John Harrison , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Greg Hackmann , Rob Clark , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst , Daniel Stone , =?UTF-8?Q?Arve_Hj=c3=b8nnev=c3=a5g?= From: =?UTF-8?Q?Emilio_L=c3=b3pez?= Message-ID: <56F92454.4060102@collabora.co.uk> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:32:20 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E04B8C.7000504@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1211 Lines: 37 Hi, I somehow missed these emails back in the day, sorry for the delay in replying. El 09/03/16 a las 13:13, Shuah Khan escribió: > On 03/09/2016 08:28 AM, Emilio López wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> This is a series of tests to exercise the sync kernel infrastructure. It is >> meant to be a test suite for the work Gustavo has been doing to destage it, >> see [0] for his latest series to date. >> >> These tests were originally part of a battery of tests shipping with >> Android's libsync that were rewritten to use the new userspace interfaces. >> >> As usual, all comments are welcome. >> >> Cheers! >> Emilio >> >> [0] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-March/102204.html > > Good to see this suite added to Kselftest. Thanks for > being thorough and including .gitignore. > > Are there any destructive and/or longer time tests > in this suite. If so could you please make them > optional to run. Please see selftests/timers as an > example for excluding. As far as I know they shouldn't destroy anything. The full sync suite runs in under 5 seconds on my virtualized setup; we can make the stress tests optional if that's too long a time, what do you think?. Cheers, Emilio