Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754240AbcC1Otv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:49:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:33781 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714AbcC1Ots convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:49:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1458834360.2544.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1458684196-15923-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> <20160323074012.GA17929@lst.de> <1458834360.2544.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:48:55 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free api From: Ming Lin To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , lkml , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1185 Lines: 39 On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:46 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 08:09 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:03:11PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> > > From: Ming Lin >> > > >> > > The fist 4 patches make the SG related >> > > definitions/structs/functions >> > > in SCSI code generic and the last patch move it to lib/sg_pool.c. >> > > >> > > I still keep the macro "SG_MEMPOOL_NR" since it's used in 3 >> > > places. >> > >> > I don't ѕee the point, but I'm not going to block the series over >> > it either. >> > >> > The new series looks really nice to me! >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >> >> Hi James, >> >> This series touches several sub-systems. >> What's the best way to merge it? > > It has a minor intrusion into > > drivers/ata/pata_icside.c | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 4 +- > drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- > > Apart from that, it's all SCSI, so the SCSI tree would seem to be the > best one. Are you OK to merge it? Thanks.