Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:10:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:10:50 -0500 Received: from s383.jpl.nasa.gov ([137.78.170.215]:54690 "EHLO s383.jpl.nasa.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:10:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3E764A72.1070903@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:21:38 -0800 From: Bryan Whitehead Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh, zh-cn, zh-hk, zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FileSystem XFS vs RiserFS vs ext3 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 928 Lines: 29 Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <3E7556C2.7030000@thizgroup.com> you wrote: > >>Hi all I get basic understanding of the functions and different between >>XFS, RiserFS and ext3. But in high volumn read write enviornment (database, >>NFS email server etc), which will provide better preformance? > > > NFS is a bit tricky. Reiser used to be broken on it, and at least from large > XFS NFS Servers I know that they tend to be unstable, still. I've never had problems with XFS+NFS on any of my servers... Is there a link or something you can provide? Thanks. -- Bryan Whitehead SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology Phone: 818 354 2903 driver@jpl.nasa.gov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/