Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186AbcC1R1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:27:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:39178 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754183AbcC1R1I (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:27:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0F389D09-1165-4686-98DF-0265351A086A@codeaurora.org> References: <1458770712-10880-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> <1458770712-10880-10-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> <20160325141521.GA12357@rob-hp-laptop> <0F389D09-1165-4686-98DF-0265351A086A@codeaurora.org> From: Rob Herring Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:26:44 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] watchdog: qcom: add kpss-standalone to device tree binding To: Matthew McClintock Cc: Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm , qca-upstream.external@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 35 On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Mar 25, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:05:04PM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: >>> Update the compatible string to add new device tree binding >>> >>> CC: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.txt | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.txt >>> index 60bb2f98..45b37cf 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/qcom-wdt.txt >>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Required properties : >>> >>> "qcom,kpss-timer" >>> "qcom,scss-timer" >>> + "qcom,kpss-standalone" >> >> What SoC(s) is this in. Use SoC specific compatible strings please. > > So ipq4019 wins the race because we are the first to try to enable watchdog for this block? Yep, that's how it is supposed to work. Newer chips claim compatibility with older ones. > qcom,kpss-ipq4019 ? Yes, but generally ,- is preferred order. Rob