Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754513AbcC1SCU (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:02:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:33381 "EHLO mail-qk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbcC1SCS (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:02:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F934B1.4080908@codeaurora.org> References: <1458245913-17211-1-git-send-email-jchandra@broadcom.com> <56F934B1.4080908@codeaurora.org> From: Jayachandran C Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:31:37 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] ACPI based PCI host driver with generic ECAM To: Sinan Kaya Cc: Gabriele Paoloni , Bjorn Helgaas , Tomasz Nowicki , "rafael@kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Hanjun Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "jiang.liu@linux.intel.com" , Stefano Stabellini , "robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com" , Marcin Wojtas , "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" , David Daney , Wangyijing , "Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "msalter@redhat.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Jon Masters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 983 Lines: 34 On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/23/2016 6:22 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >> I had a look at your patchset and also in your git repo at the other >> patches that you ported over from Tomasz; it seems that now we miss >> a quirk mechanism to enable controller that are not fully ECAM. >> >> This was provided before by Tomasz in: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/16/410 >> >> I think we should put something like that back in... Like Tomasz mentioned in his mail, his approach does not work for raw operations. I have added raw operations in may patchset, so we have to come up with a new approach or decide that raw operations can be dropped. I am waiting for the overall acceptance of the patch set before going further along this path >> >> Thanks >> >> Gab > > I was requested to test your patchset. I'll need this mechanism before > I can start. Please see above, we will need to look at the quirks again. > Sinan JC.