Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752390AbcC2E5X (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:57:23 -0400
Received: from nat-hk.nvidia.com ([203.18.50.4]:65195 "EHLO
	hkmmgate102.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750727AbcC2E5U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:57:20 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hkpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:57:17 -0700
Message-ID: <56FA0B45.70404@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:57:41 +0800
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CC: <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>, <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        <mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] Add T210 support in Tegra soctherm
References: <1458118571-29717-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <56F4CE8D.5020108@nvidia.com> <20160329030440.GA2315@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20160329030440.GA2315@localhost.localdomain>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.224.146]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRBGMAIL103.nvidia.com (10.18.16.22) To
 HKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.18.16.10)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 27



On 2016年03月29日 11:04, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:37:17PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Hi, Eduardo
>> Will you take this series, it seems no more comments.
> 
> Yeah, I am taking a look at it. Something is fishy about it. Patch 04
> does not apply cleanly. Also, why did you split the patches into two
> email threads, one which is 1-4 and another one is 5-14?

Sorry, what do you mean "split the patches into two email threads"? And what's
the 1-4 and 5-14?
I think I didn't split my patches into two email thread.

Thanks.
Wei.

> 
> I have ammended patch 04 at my side, but you need to validate your
> series is one piece (please check my tree and linux-next).
> 
> BR,
> 
> Eduardo Valentin
> 
>>