Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:16:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:16:27 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.65.60]:21572 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:16:27 -0500 From: "Marijn Kruisselbrink" To: Subject: RE: (2.5.65) Unresolved symbols in modules? Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 02:27:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <1047950384.12620.18.camel@rohan.arnor.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 609 Lines: 14 > - module-init-tools documentation stated if it is or is not backward > compatible for the 2.4 kernels (is it?) If you have a new enough version of modutils, and you rename these to depmod.old modprobe.old etcetera, they are backwards-compatible... > - The kernel makefile used the module tools under /usr/local/sbin if > they exist. I totally agree with this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/