Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932256AbcC2KDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:03:24 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:39530 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932237AbcC2KDW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:03:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:03:09 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: uniphier: fix up cache ops broadcast of ACTLR Message-ID: <20160329100308.GW19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1459215505-18035-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1459215505-18035-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459215505-18035-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2087 Lines: 53 On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:38:23AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > The Boot ROM of the UniPhier ARMv7 SoCs sets ACTLR (Auxiliary Control > Register) to different values for different secure states: > > [1] Set ACTLR to 0x41 for Non-secure boot > [2] Set ACTLR to 0x40 for Secure boot > > [1] is okay, but [2] is a problem. Because of commit 1b3a02eb4523 > ("ARMv7: Check whether the SMP/nAMP mode was already enabled"), > if bit 6 (SMP bit) is already set, the kernel skips the ACTLR setting. > In that case, bit 0 (FW bit) is never set, so cache ops is not > broadcasted, causing a cache coherency problem. > > To solve the problem, this commit sets the bit 0 of ACTLR if the bit 4 > has already been set. This change is harmless for [1] because the > Boot ROM has already set NSACR (Non-secure Access Control Register) > bit 18 (NS_SMP bit) before switching to Non-secure state in order to > allow write access to the ACTLR. The test in proc-v7.S is too weak, we should probably tighten it to prevent these kinds of problems, iow: arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S index 0f8963a7e7d9..6fcaac8e200f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S @@ -281,12 +281,12 @@ __v7_ca17mp_setup: bl v7_invalidate_l1 ldmia r12, {r1-r6, lr} #ifdef CONFIG_SMP + orr r10, r10, #(1 << 6) @ Enable SMP/nAMP mode ALT_SMP(mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1) - ALT_UP(mov r0, #(1 << 6)) @ fake it for UP - tst r0, #(1 << 6) @ SMP/nAMP mode enabled? - orreq r0, r0, #(1 << 6) @ Enable SMP/nAMP mode - orreq r0, r0, r10 @ Enable CPU-specific SMP bits - mcreq p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 + ALT_UP(mov r0, r10) @ fake it for UP + orr r10, r10, r0 @ Set required bits + teq r10, r0 @ Were they already set? + mcrne p15, 0, r10, c1, c0, 1 @ No, update register #endif b __v7_setup_cont -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.