Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757051AbcC2LxN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:53:13 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39581 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756838AbcC2LxK (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:53:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1459252386.5053.18.camel@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers/bus: make arm-ccn.c driver explicitly non-modular From: Pawel Moll To: Will Deacon , Paul Gortmaker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:53:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160329114525.GC6745@arm.com> References: <1459113058-14340-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1459113058-14340-5-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160329114525.GC6745@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 409 Lines: 11 Dnia 2016-03-29, Tue o godzinie 12:45 +0100, Will Deacon pisze: > I'd much rather fix the driver to build as a module, if at all > possible. > Suzuki (CC'd) is taking a look at that, so please drop this patch for > now. There's no problem with building arm-ccn.c as a module - all it's really doing today is providing a PMU driver. I don't even know why have I made it bool-only in the first place... Pawel