Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:13:09 -0700
From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
To: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, MLongnecker@nvidia.com,
        swarren@wwwdotorg.org, mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 RESEND 00/14] Add T210 support in Tegra soctherm
Message-ID: <20160329151307.GA1855@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1459247364-1139-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com>
 <56FA5AC0.1080400@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <56FA5AC0.1080400@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 644
Lines: 21

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:36:48PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
> I resent this V9 series in one mail thread.

I personally prefer in one mail thread, like
you did here. But It is fine for me if you send either way,
in one mail thread or each patch in its own thread. 

What I found strange is that in your v8 patches from 1 to 4 have the
message id of patch 0 in its in-reply-to field (one email thread). But
patches 5 to 14 don't (each patch in a single thread). Which made me
wonder if this is a bug in git send email of if you intentionally did
that, for some reason.


BTW, now the patch series applies fine.


BR,

Eduardo Valentin