Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:28:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:28:30 -0500 Received: from tilde.ookhoi.dds.nl ([194.109.10.165]:896 "HELO humilis.ookhoi.dds.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:28:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:28:02 +0100 From: Ookhoi To: Jordan Mendelson Cc: "David S. Miller" , Vibol Hou , Linux-Kernel , sim@stormix.com Subject: Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (Re: netdev issues (3c905B)) Message-ID: <20010222092802.B405@humilis> Reply-To: ookhoi@dds.nl In-Reply-To: <20010221104723.C1714@humilis> <14995.40701.818777.181432@pizda.ninka.net> <3A94418D.A0DD99BF@napster.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <3A94418D.A0DD99BF@napster.com>; from jordy@napster.com on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:37PM -0800 X-Uptime: 8:48am up 5 min, 5 users, load average: 0.25, 0.12, 0.05 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jordan, > > > We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the > > > following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip > > > header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in > > > Holland called 'Wish' (which seemes to stand for 'I Wish I had a faster > > > connection'). > > > If we remove one of the three conditions, the connection is oke. It is > > > only tcp which is affected. > > > A packet on its way from linux server to windows client seems to get > > > dropped once and retransmitted. This makes the connection _very_ slow. > > > > :-( I hate these buggy systems. > > > > Does this patch below fix the performance problem and are the windows > > clients win2000 or win95? > > I wanted to see if this would fix the problem I was seeing with Win9x > users on PPP w/ compression dialing up to Earthlink in the bay area > (there are others, but it's the only one I can reproduce). > > I compiled 2.4.1 with this change and for some odd reason, the kernel > started dropping packets and became unusable (couldn't ssh in) after > around 4050 connections were opened. I tested it also with 2.4.1-ac20 > and had the same problem right around 4050 connections. > > This is on a VA Linux box with dual eepro100's (one used) connected to a > Cisco 6509. I patched two computers, 2.4.1-ac20. One of them is a fairly loaded webserver. Both have an uptime of 15.15 and 16.30 hours, and are fine. Didn't test with that much connections though. Ookhoi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/