Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:36:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:36:12 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:62980 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:36:11 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200303181048.h2IAmurm000784@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.65 To: cat@zip.com.au (CaT) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:48:56 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030318103557.GF504@zip.com.au> from "CaT" at Mar 18, 2003 09:35:57 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 901 Lines: 22 > > > The help and the tristate seems to indicate that I should be able to > > > compile it into the kernel, but menuconfig wont let me. This is > > > presumably due to the dependancy but is it right? > > > > Yes, this was the behaviour of the old config tools, which was restored > > with 2.5.65. This means 'm' is a marker that this thing works only as a > > module. > > If you want the other behaviour, that it can only be built as a module in > > a modular kernel, but compile it into a nonmodular kernel, you can use "m > > || !MODULES" instead. > > Ahhh. So if I want module support but not use it as a module then I'm > SOL? vi .config John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/