Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:10:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:10:57 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:17806 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:10:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 03:21:46 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix waitqueue leak in devfs_d_revalidate_wait Message-Id: <20030318032146.04f32a6b.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030318105625.B4424@lst.de> References: <20030318105625.B4424@lst.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2003 11:21:36.0721 (UTC) FILETIME=[89E8A410:01C2ED40] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 907 Lines: 23 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I still hope Adam's smalldevfs will get merged anyway.. Well me too, but smalldevfs is a bit stalled at present. It seems to work OK now, but there are a few small incompatibilities with the current devfs. People need to make adjustments to their initscripts, or to untar a tarball-of-device-nodes into smalldevfs at boot time. Like all other kernel developers I do not use devfs and am not really able to evaluate how serious these problems will be for people. Adam is disinclined to address these administrative incompatibilites in his user-space tools. smalldevfs is presently at risk of getting dropped out. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/