Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754730AbcC3Qol (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:44:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35334 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbcC3Qoi (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:44:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E801EB.6030107@st.com> References: <1457294038-14243-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56DDA3D5.3090209@st.com> <56DDB749.1020808@suse.de> <56DE7E1D.5070508@st.com> <56DFE55B.2090806@st.com> <56DFE64B.8060606@st.com> <56DFF253.9050208@st.com> <56DFFA9E.7060602@st.com> <56E033C8.40506@st.com> <56E038CE.606@st.com> <56E13AAB.2080900@st.com> <56E28B5D.6000708@st.com> <56E6E4B0.8060408@st.com> <56E801EB.6030107@st.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:44:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement From: Dinh Nguyen To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO Cc: Tomeu Vizoso , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Fabrice GASNIER , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , LAKML , Gabriel Fernandez , Alexandre TORGUE , =?UTF-8?Q?Frank_Sch=C3=A4fer?= , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1684 Lines: 46 On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hello Tomeu > > On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> Thanks. >> >> Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that >> 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in >> there, so I guess we have now a bunch of boards with broken network on >> that release:( > > > > This is the status on my side: I am testing on an HW that has the > Enhanced descriptors and all works fine. > > On this HW, if I force the driver to use the normal descriptor > layout, I meet problems but using both net.git and net-next. > So I suspect I cannot ply with this HW forcing the normal descriptors. > But! That is helping me to check if, on net-next, the stmmac is > actually programming fine the normal desc case. > I have just found another fix so I kindly ask you to apply the temp > patch attached and let me know. > In details, I have noticed that the OWN bit was not set in the right > TDES0. > > I also ask you to give me a log of the kernel where the stmmac was > running fine. I would like to see which configuration it is selected > at runtime by the driver on your box. > From your previous logs (where the stmmac failed), it seems that > the problem is on normal desc but, to be honest, this is the first > case I see a 3.50a with HW capability register and w/o Enhanced > descriptors. > Are you still working on a fix for: [ 1.196110] libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found [ 1.200972] eth0: Could not attach to PHY [ 1.204991] stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19) I see the error still there as of linux-next 20160330. Dinh