Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754846AbcC3RlL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:41:11 -0400 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:7430 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752794AbcC3RlJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:41:09 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:39:52 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Fix deadlock during regulator registration To: Mark Brown References: <1459354153-6352-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <20160330161831.GE2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FC02CD.60107@nvidia.com> <20160330170053.GK2350@sirena.org.uk> CC: Liam Girdwood , Javier Martinez Canillas , , From: Jon Hunter Message-ID: <56FC0FAF.3010200@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:41:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160330170053.GK2350@sirena.org.uk> X-Originating-IP: [10.21.132.115] X-ClientProxiedBy: UKMAIL102.nvidia.com (10.26.138.15) To UKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.26.138.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1200 Lines: 31 On 30/03/16 18:00, Mark Brown wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:46:05PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something > substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much > easier to read and reply to. > >>> Please don't paste entire backlogs into changelogs, they're *enormous*, >>> mostly noise and obscure any actual content that's in there through >>> denial of service. If they're useful then include edited subsets that >>> highlight the relevant sections of the backtrace so your changelog is >>> more legible. > >> Ok, no problem. Are you happy with the patch otherwise? If so, do you >> want me to resend or do you wish to trim the backlog? I think that > > I haven't reviwed it yet. > >> this part is interesting ... > > I'm really getting nothing at all from this, all it really does is point > to the call site but that's already much more clearly identified in the > changelog. We certainly don't need to know which driver called this. Ok, fine with me. If you are happy with the actual change, feel free to remove the backlog or I can re-send if you wish. Jon