Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752791AbcC3X3E (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:29:04 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f195.google.com ([209.85.217.195]:35927 "EHLO mail-lb0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbcC3X3B (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:29:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1459376311.13525.108.camel@linux.intel.com> <56FC5277.9050906@intel.com> <1459378003.13525.117.camel@linux.intel.com> <1459379847.13525.129.camel@intel.com> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:28:59 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lfhhEQlAYStmtH2XSFwNajQllIg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [intel-pstate driver regression] processor frequency very high even if in idle From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" , "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "dsmythies@telus.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "jrg.otte@gmail.com" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "rafael@kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1504 Lines: 48 On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pandruvada, Srinivas > wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:46 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >>> On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 00:25 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> > >>> > On 3/31/2016 12:18 AM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > I am using Intel-PState-Driver here with v4.6-rc1 and Intel- >>> > > > SandyBridge-CPU. >>> > > > >>> > > > Here are my turbostat results attached. >>> > > > >>> > > > $ cd $BUILD_DIR >>> > > > $ LC_ALL=C make -C tools/ turbostat >>> > > > >>> > > > $ sudo ./turbostat -i 1 --msr=0x199 --debug --out >>> > > > /tmp/turbostat-i-1-msr-0x199-debug.txt >>> > > > >>> > > > Will try . >>> > > > >>> > > > Please see attached files. >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks. Your logs make sense. You have config set to performance >>> > > mode >>> > > by default (Which I believe default in all kernel Ubuntu). So as >>> > > expected Intel P state was asking for max. So there is no issue >>> > > here. >>> > But the behavior is different from what it used to be, isn't it? >>> > [cut] > > Too much questions. OK > I switched to CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE=y and tested with > the simplified revert-patch of Rafael. Why do you need the revert patch in the first place?