Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 05:20:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 05:19:58 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:24080 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 05:19:46 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac15 To: rusty@linuxcare.com.au (Rusty Russell) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:22:56 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), prumpf@mandrakesoft.com (Philipp Rumpf), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Rusty Russell" at Feb 22, 2001 01:05:04 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > We can take page faults in interrupt handlers in 2.4 so I had to use a > > spinlock, but that sounds the same > > We can? Woah, please explain. vmalloc does a lazy load of the tlb. That can lead to the exception table being walked on an IRQ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/