Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754367AbcCaH55 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:57:57 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:58889 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752735AbcCaH5y (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:57:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:57:49 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Kamil Debski , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Joachim Eastwood , Thomas Petazzoni , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Robert Jarzmik , Alexandre Belloni , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hartley Sweeten , Ryan Mallon , Alexander Shiyan , Milo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/46] pwm: introduce the pwm_args concept Message-ID: <20160331095749.4be1e76b@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20160330215510.GS18567@codeaurora.org> References: <1459368249-13241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1459368249-13241-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20160330215510.GS18567@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1080 Lines: 45 On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:55:10 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity { > > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED, > > }; > > > > +/** > > + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments > > + * @period: reference period > > + * @polarity: reference polarity > > + * > > + * This structure describe board-dependent arguments attached to a PWM > > s/describe/describes/ > > > + * device. Those arguments are usually retrieved from the PWM lookup table or > > + * DT definition. > > + * This should not be confused with the PWM state: PWM args not representing > > s/not representing/don't represent/ ? Yes, I meant "are not representing", but "don't represent" is fine. > > > + * the current PWM state, but the configuration the PWM user plan to use > > s/plan/plans/ > > > + * on this PWM device. > > + */ > > +struct pwm_args { > > + unsigned int period; > > + enum pwm_polarity polarity; > > +}; > > + > -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com