Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755366AbcCaM2N (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:28:13 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47019 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751038AbcCaM2M (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:28:12 -0400
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:28:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7][Resend] cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on
 scheduler utilization data
Message-ID: <20160331122809.GK3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <7262976.zPkLj56ATU@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <6666532.7ULg06hQ7e@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20160328090333.GK32495@vireshk-i7>
 <2253696.9jRPsKRmxz@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <CAJZ5v0jEueokR+bZJVRjQtmUe6BeKqUgnjWy9BZm4nGnKjT9mg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jEueokR+bZJVRjQtmUe6BeKqUgnjWy9BZm4nGnKjT9mg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 256
Lines: 7

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:12:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Except that for_each_cpu_and_not is not defined as of today.
> 
> I guess I can play with cpumasks, but then I'm not sure that will end
> up actually more efficient.

It will not indeed.