Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756656AbcCaRCY (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:02:24 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:52331 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752030AbcCaRCW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:02:22 -0400 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] Documentation: devicetree: rockchip: Document GeekBox Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:02:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1913373.6hKqMKImXt@phil> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.3.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.14; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1682289.HWd4yLL18I@diego> References: <1458136727-32075-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <56FAE95E.6060900@suse.de> <1682289.HWd4yLL18I@diego> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1290 Lines: 34 Am Dienstag, 29. M?rz 2016, 23:21:51 schrieb Heiko St?bner: > Am Dienstag, 29. M?rz 2016, 22:45:18 schrieb Andreas F?rber: > > Am 29.03.2016 um 22:13 schrieb Heiko St?bner: > > > Am Mittwoch, 16. M?rz 2016, 14:58:41 schrieb Andreas F?rber: > > >> Use "geekbuying,geekbox" compatible string. > > >> > > >> Acked-by: Rob Herring > > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber > > > > > > I've folded this patch into the geekbox dts patch, carrying Rob's Ack > > > for > > > the binding over. > > > > Either you just made a mistake in my name or > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Do > > cume ntation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt needs an update. > > It clearly says: > > > > "1) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch." > > > > That's why I always do it this way. > > looking at the dt-bindings git log, it seems that is handled in a variety > of ways :-) . Personally I'm doing completely new bindings separately but > the 125th addition of a board just inside the dts patch. > > But I guess we can also move it out again into a separate patch if you > prefer that :-) . I've split out that documentation addition again and applied this separate patch instead :-) . Heiko