Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757281AbcCaTJp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:09:45 -0400
Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:11323 "EHLO
	hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752462AbcCaTJo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:09:44 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:07:55 -0700
Message-ID: <56FD7379.2000307@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:29:05 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gandhar Dighe <gdighe@nvidia.com>, "Stuart Yates" <syates@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: DT: Add support to scale ramp delay based
 on platform behavior
References: <20160330181623.GQ2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FCCC60.3080303@nvidia.com> <20160331165145.GF2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FD5A9F.5050001@nvidia.com> <20160331174741.GO2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FD62BA.3040406@nvidia.com> <20160331183130.GR2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FD6CF7.5080909@nvidia.com> <20160331184553.GS2350@sirena.org.uk> <56FD6ED6.3020507@nvidia.com> <20160331185945.GT2350@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160331185945.GT2350@sirena.org.uk>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.20) To
 bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 892
Lines: 27


On Friday 01 April 2016 12:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:09:18AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> The setting for observed value is not there for device configuration.
>> Device support 5mV/us and 100mV/us.
>> We observed 50mV/us when setting device to 100mV/us.
> But you said the device had a configuration for 50mV/us?
I looked for last 4 communication and tried to find out if any typo on 
mail so that I can correct but did not found.

/**
Here is the case,
PMIC supports 2 ramp time configurations 5mv/us and 100mV/us. This is 
supported with some specific capacitance in rail output per 
recommendation from PMIC
**/

So may be more older may have..

But here is the stuff without typo ;-)
Device supports 5mV/us and 100mV/us which is not in observed value.

And this is the only reason for requesting of second property.